Board building7 min read

    What investors look for in a board before a Series A

    Independence, a functioning cadence, and someone who could chair audit. Composition is a diligence item, and it takes a quarter to fix.

    Founder, InvestingDirectors

    Published · Last updated

    Not published. This page is a preview and is not indexed.

    • Blocked: metaDescription has no number, but the article does
    • Warning: no number in the first 100 words — answer-first structure needs a specific figure early
    • Warning: 2 calls to action in the body — one converts better than a choice

    Key points

    • Independence is the first test. A board of founders and investor directors has two constituencies and no referee.
    • Cadence and information matter as much as composition: investors ask to see the last four board packs.
    • Committee readiness — someone who could chair audit — becomes an expectation between Series A and B.
    • Most Series A boards are formed shortly after a round closes. Doing it before the process starts removes a diligence finding.
    • No UK private company must appoint a non-executive. The UK Corporate Governance Code binds premium-listed companies, but investors apply its thinking well below that.

    What do investors look for in a board before a Series A?

    Three things. Whether anyone independent is in the room who is neither a founder nor an investor. Whether the board actually functions — proper packs, real decisions, minutes. And whether the composition will support the next two rounds, including someone capable of chairing audit.

    Board composition is a diligence item, it takes a quarter to fix, and it is the least glamorous reason a round slows down.

    Why composition comes up in diligence at all

    Because an investor is buying a governance structure as well as a business. A Series A lead is committing capital for five to ten years, usually with a board seat and reserved matters. What they are assessing is whether decisions in that room will be taken properly when things go wrong — not whether they will be taken well when things go well.

    A board that has never had an independent voice has no evidence of that. Every decision to date has been taken by people with a direct interest in the outcome. That is not a criticism of the founders; it is an absence of the thing the investor is being asked to rely on.

    Test one: is anyone independent?

    Count the people in the room and ask how many are neither a founder nor a shareholder representative. If the answer is zero, this is the finding.

    Independence has a working meaning: no employment relationship, no material shareholding acquired as compensation, no relationship with a fund invested in the company, and no other connection that would reasonably be seen to affect their judgement. An investing non-executive who bought shares at the round price is generally still regarded as independent, because the holding is aligned with all shareholders rather than with one fund.

    Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 applies to every director, including investor directors. But an investor director exercises that duty while also answering to a fund with its own lifecycle and entry price. An independent director does not.

    Test two: does the board function?

    Investors ask for the last four board packs. They are looking for packs circulated in advance, ideally five working days, rather than handed out in the meeting; consistent management information, with the same metrics period on period and variance explained against the same plan; decisions recorded in minutes with owners and dates rather than pages of narrative; a risk register that has actually changed between meetings; and evidence of challenge.

    That last one carries more weight than founders expect. A set of minutes in which the board has never disagreed reads as a board that does not function. And a three-person board running proper meetings inspires more confidence than a five-person board that meets to be presented to.

    Test three: will the composition survive the next two rounds?

    By Series B, an investor expects to see committee structures forming and someone capable of chairing audit. That means a director with genuine financial literacy — able to interrogate management accounts, not just read them.

    Investors also look at succession: what happens if the chair leaves, and whether the board would still hold together.

    A common Series A board shape
    SeatWho
    1Chief executive
    2One other founder or executive
    3Lead investor director
    4Second investor director, or an observer
    5Independent non-executive, ideally the chair

    Six findings that slow a round down

    No independent director — the headline one. Board packs assembled the night before, or not at all. No minutes, or minutes that record discussion rather than decisions. Undeclared conflicts, such as a director with an interest in a supplier that has never been recorded.

    No D&O cover, which reads as a board that has not thought about risk and deters strong candidates. And adviser equity granted years ago and never revisited: a cap table carrying dormant advisory grants is a lawyer's first find.

    Each is fixable in weeks. Together they take a quarter, which is why they are worth fixing before a process rather than during one.

    What can you do in the weeks before a round?

    Appoint the independent director — five ranked candidates in 21 days is achievable, and the appointment itself takes another few weeks. Fix the pack: three consistent months of proper packs is more persuasive than one impressive one. Write up the minutes you should already have.

    Buy D&O cover, often a few hundred pounds a year for £1 million at small-company scale. And tidy the cap table, cancelling unvested adviser grants where the relationship has ended.

    Why does an investing director help here specifically?

    Because it answers the alignment question before it is asked. An independent director who has subscribed at the round price with their own money is aligned with all shareholders, carries downside as well as upside, and gives the incoming investor a co-investor on the board rather than a paid overseer.

    In our experience investors push for it rather than resist it: it is a governance argument and a funding signal simultaneously. Across our network, investing directors commit an average of £32,700, with tickets typically £100,000 to £500,000 at Series A.

    Where to go next

    For timing, see when to appoint your first independent director. For the mechanics of the meetings investors will ask to see, how to run your first board meeting.

    Common questions

    What do investors look for in a startup board?

    Three things, in order: whether anyone in the room is neither a founder nor a shareholder representative; whether the board functions, judged from the last four board packs and minutes; and whether the composition will support the next two rounds, including someone capable of chairing an audit committee.

    Does a startup need an independent director before Series A?

    Nothing in UK law requires it. But a board that has never had an independent voice has taken every decision to date through people with a direct interest in the outcome, and that is the absence a lead investor is being asked to rely on. It is the commonest composition finding in diligence.

    How many people should be on a Series A board?

    Five is a common and workable shape: the chief executive, one other founder or executive, the lead investor director, a second investor director or observer, and an independent non-executive — ideally the chair. Seven becomes a committee; three cannot form committees or absorb a resignation.

    What is board independence?

    No employment relationship, no material shareholding acquired as compensation, no relationship with a fund invested in the company, and no other connection that would reasonably be seen to affect judgement. A director who bought shares at the round price is generally still regarded as independent, because the holding is aligned with all shareholders rather than one fund.

    Sources

    Board Readiness Score

    Twelve questions across five dimensions of governance, free to take.

    You get a score out of 100, your weakest dimension and three specific fixes.

    Take the Board Readiness Score

    Read next

    InvestingDirectors makes introductions between companies and board-level candidates. We do not provide investment, tax or legal advice.

    A Sustainable Wealth Group company.